Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs MCDFX
FCHKX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$46.45
Change+$0.94 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.64
Change+$0.25 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FCHKX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHKX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHKX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MCDFX (99.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: MCDFX (2.90) vs FCHKX (0.50). FCHKX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FCHKX (17 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). FCHKX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FCHKX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.60 vs. FCHKX (39.47). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : -1.16 vs. MCDFX (-3.84).
| FCHKX | MCDFX | FCHKX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.913 | 26.550 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 2.90 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.47 | 44.60 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.14 | 23.01 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.16 | -3.84 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.13 | 46.29 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement