Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHTX vs SWMRX
FCHTX vs SWMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHTX vs. SWMRX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHTX is a Hold and SWMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHTX has more cash in the bank: 43.3B vs. SWMRX (358M). SWMRX pays higher dividends than FCHTX: SWMRX (1.74) vs FCHTX (1.29). FCHTX was incepted earlier than SWMRX: FCHTX (9 years) vs SWMRX (13 years). SWMRX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FCHTX (0.37). SWMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.00 vs. FCHTX (5.00). SWMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCHTX: SWMRX (0) vs FCHTX (1000000). FCHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.57 vs. SWMRX (11.73). FCHTX (46.98) and SWMRX (45.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCHTX | SWMRX | FCHTX / SWMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.52 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.55 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.074 | 14.897 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.3B | 358M | 12,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.74 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 11.73 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.30 | 55.52 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.98 | 45.87 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.28 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers