Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIFX vs FSNKX
FCIFX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. FSNKX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.12B vs. FCIFX (213M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than FCIFX: FSNKX (2.95) vs FCIFX (2.64). FCIFX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FCIFX (22 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FCIFX (0.46) is less costly to investors than FSNKX (0.42). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSNKX (14.00). FCIFX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.54 vs. FCIFX (6.19). FSNKX return over 5 years is better than : 5.02 vs. FCIFX (4.24).
| FCIFX | FSNKX | FCIFX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.42 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.42 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.661 | 5.847 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 3.12B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.95 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 6.54 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.06 | 17.85 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.24 | 5.02 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers