Ad is loading...
FCIFX vs FSNKX
FCIFX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. FSNKX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.11B vs. FCIFX (211M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than FCIFX: FSNKX (2.98) vs FCIFX (2.65). FCIFX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FCIFX (22 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FCIFX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FSNKX (0.43). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. FSNKX (13.00). FCIFX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCIFX (7.53) and FSNKX (7.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FSNKX return over 5 years is better than : 8.02 vs. FCIFX (7.19).
| FCIFX | FSNKX | FCIFX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.43 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.619 | 2.443 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.11B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.98 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 7.51 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.54 | 8.96 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.19 | 8.02 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.47 | N/A | - |