Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIFX vs FSNKX
FCIFX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. FSNKX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNKX has more cash in the bank: 3.14B vs. FCIFX (211M). FSNKX pays higher dividends than FCIFX: FSNKX (2.91) vs FCIFX (2.60). FCIFX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FCIFX (22 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FCIFX (0.46) is less costly to investors than FSNKX (0.42). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSNKX (14.00). FCIFX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.99 vs. FCIFX (6.51). FSNKX return over 5 years is better than : 6.76 vs. FCIFX (5.92).
| FCIFX | FSNKX | FCIFX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.42 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.42 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.634 | 7.939 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.14B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 2.91 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 6.99 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.48 | 24.46 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.92 | 6.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers