Ad is loading...
FCIFX vs RAATX
FCIFX vs RAATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. RAATX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and RAATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAATX has more cash in the bank: 3.79B vs. FCIFX (211M). FCIFX pays higher dividends than RAATX: FCIFX (2.65) vs RAATX (2.17). FCIFX was incepted earlier than RAATX: FCIFX (22 years) vs RAATX (18 years). RAATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCIFX (0.48). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RAATX (8.00). FCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAATX: FCIFX (0) vs RAATX (250). FCIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. RAATX (6.61). RAATX return over 5 years is better than : 17.57 vs. FCIFX (7.19).
| FCIFX | RAATX | FCIFX / RAATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.38 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.38 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.619 | 2.591 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.79B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.17 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 6.61 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.54 | 9.13 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.19 | 17.57 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.47 | 23.23 | 6% |