Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIFX vs RBATX
FCIFX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. RBATX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. FCIFX (211M). FCIFX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FCIFX (2.60) vs RBATX (2.02). FCIFX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FCIFX (22 years) vs RBATX (19 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCIFX (0.46). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FCIFX (0) vs RBATX (250). RBATX (6.70) and FCIFX (6.51) have marching annual gain over last year. RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 17.12 vs. FCIFX (5.92).
| FCIFX | RBATX | FCIFX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.38 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.38 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.634 | 9.162 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.94B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 2.02 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 6.70 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.48 | 20.73 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.92 | 17.12 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.27 | 36.88 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers