Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIFX vs RDATX
FCIFX vs RDATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. RDATX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and RDATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDATX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. FCIFX (211M). RDATX (2.67) and FCIFX (2.60) have matching dividends . FCIFX was incepted earlier than RDATX: FCIFX (22 years) vs RDATX (19 years). RDATX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FCIFX (0.46). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RDATX (8.00). FCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDATX: FCIFX (0) vs RDATX (250). RDATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.55 vs. FCIFX (6.51). RDATX return over 5 years is better than : 20.82 vs. FCIFX (5.92).
| FCIFX | RDATX | FCIFX / RDATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.63 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.63 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.634 | 9.750 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.94B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 2.67 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 7.55 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.48 | 23.09 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.92 | 20.82 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.27 | 43.13 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers