Ad is loading...
FCIFX vs RDATX
FCIFX vs RDATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. RDATX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and RDATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDATX has more cash in the bank: 3.79B vs. FCIFX (211M). RDATX pays higher dividends than FCIFX: RDATX (2.84) vs FCIFX (2.65). FCIFX was incepted earlier than RDATX: FCIFX (22 years) vs RDATX (18 years). RDATX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FCIFX (0.48). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RDATX (8.00). FCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDATX: FCIFX (0) vs RDATX (250). FCIFX (7.53) and RDATX (7.41) have marching annual gain over last year. RDATX return over 5 years is better than : 21.29 vs. FCIFX (7.19).
| FCIFX | RDATX | FCIFX / RDATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.63 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.63 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.619 | 2.761 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.79B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.84 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 7.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.54 | 11.24 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.19 | 21.29 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.47 | 28.17 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers