Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIFX vs RFTTX
FCIFX vs RFTTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. RFTTX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and RFTTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFTTX has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. FCIFX (212M). RFTTX pays higher dividends than FCIFX: RFTTX (3.17) vs FCIFX (2.70). FCIFX was incepted earlier than RFTTX: FCIFX (22 years) vs RFTTX (16 years). FCIFX (0.46) is less costly to investors than RFTTX (0.29). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RFTTX (8.00). FCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFTTX: FCIFX (0) vs RFTTX (250). RFTTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. FCIFX (7.01). RFTTX return over 5 years is better than : 25.10 vs. FCIFX (8.41).
| FCIFX | RFTTX | FCIFX / RFTTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.29 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.29 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.004 | 7.143 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 3.91B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.17 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 9.37 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.63 | 20.64 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.41 | 25.10 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.88 | 39.15 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement