Ad is loading...
FCIFX vs RFTTX
FCIFX vs RFTTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. RFTTX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and RFTTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFTTX has more cash in the bank: 3.79B vs. FCIFX (211M). RFTTX pays higher dividends than FCIFX: RFTTX (3.23) vs FCIFX (2.65). FCIFX was incepted earlier than RFTTX: FCIFX (22 years) vs RFTTX (16 years). FCIFX (0.48) is less costly to investors than RFTTX (0.29). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RFTTX (8.00). FCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFTTX: FCIFX (0) vs RFTTX (250). RFTTX (7.81) and FCIFX (7.53) have marching annual gain over last year. RFTTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.05 vs. FCIFX (7.19).
| FCIFX | RFTTX | FCIFX / RFTTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.29 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.29 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.619 | 2.926 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.79B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 3.23 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 7.81 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.54 | 12.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.19 | 23.05 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.47 | 30.90 | 5% |