Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIFX vs RFTTX
FCIFX vs RFTTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIFX vs. RFTTX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIFX is a Hold and RFTTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFTTX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. FCIFX (211M). RFTTX pays higher dividends than FCIFX: RFTTX (3.04) vs FCIFX (2.60). FCIFX was incepted earlier than RFTTX: FCIFX (22 years) vs RFTTX (16 years). FCIFX (0.46) is less costly to investors than RFTTX (0.29). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RFTTX (8.00). FCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFTTX: FCIFX (0) vs RFTTX (250). RFTTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. FCIFX (6.51). RFTTX return over 5 years is better than : 22.67 vs. FCIFX (5.92).
| FCIFX | RFTTX | FCIFX / RFTTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.29 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.29 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.634 | 10.069 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 211M | 3.94B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 3.04 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 7.95 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.48 | 24.16 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.92 | 22.67 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.27 | 46.20 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers