Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERCX
FCIHX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERCX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.91
Change+$0.15 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets787.39M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$63.61
Change+$0.53 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
FCIHX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a StrongBuy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FCIHX (787M). FCIHX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FCIHX (0.65) vs RERCX (0.47). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERCX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.96 vs. FCIHX (3.32).
| FCIHX | RERCX | FCIHX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.12 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.419 | 21.952 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 139B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.47 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 10.96 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 44.41 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.26 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.42 | 43.16 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement