Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERGX
FCIHX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERGX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets768.37M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$62.02
Change+$0.35 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.08B
FCIHX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERGX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a StrongBuy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FCIHX (768M). RERGX pays higher dividends than FCIHX: RERGX (0.93) vs FCIHX (0.66). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FCIHX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERGX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. FCIHX (-0.43).
| FCIHX | RERGX | FCIHX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.47 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.47 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.857 | 15.450 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 768M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | 8.20 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 35.20 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 12.67 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.13 | 43.62 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement