Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERGX
FCIHX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERGX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.10
Change+$0.28 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.75M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$61.47
Change+$0.75 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.4B
FCIHX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERGX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FCIHX (834M). RERGX pays higher dividends than FCIHX: RERGX (0.96) vs FCIHX (0.68). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FCIHX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERGX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.34 vs. FCIHX (5.42).
| FCIHX | RERGX | FCIHX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.47 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.47 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.425 | 14.427 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 132B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.96 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 13.34 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 25.47 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.47 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.22 | 28.33 | 258% |