Ad is loading...
FCISX vs RLBAX
FCISX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FCISX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income C
Price$2.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.92B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.00
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.12B
FCISX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCISX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCISX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. FCISX (71.9B). FCISX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FCISX (5.04) vs RLBAX (1.28). FCISX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FCISX (30 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FCISX (1.12). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: RLBAX (250) vs FCISX (1000). FCISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. RLBAX (3.43). FCISX return over 5 years is better than : 45.15 vs. RLBAX (32.37).
| FCISX | RLBAX | FCISX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.31 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.31 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.818 | 0.096 | 856% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9B | 234B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.04 | 1.28 | 395% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.05 | 3.43 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.55 | 19.38 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.15 | 32.37 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.87 | 44.68 | 98% |