Ad is loading...
FCIUX vs RERCX
FCIUX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FCIUX vs RERCX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl I
Price$16.13
Change-$0.32 (-1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets824.25M
American Funds Europacific Growth R3
Price$52.47
Change-$1.52 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.35B
FCIUX vs RERCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIUX vs. RERCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIUX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. FCIUX (824M). RERCX pays higher dividends than FCIUX: RERCX (0.85) vs FCIUX (0.63). FCIUX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FCIUX (8 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FCIUX (0.93). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIUX (12.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIUX: RERCX (250) vs FCIUX (1000000). FCIUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.42 vs. RERCX (-7.24). FCIUX return over 5 years is better than : 74.65 vs. RERCX (34.70).
| FCIUX | RERCX | FCIUX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.12 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.12 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.356 | 0.594 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 125B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.42 | -7.24 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.69 | -5.24 | -261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.65 | 34.70 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.95 | - |