Ad is loading...
FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs RGFTX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$14.36
Change+$0.10 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.18M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.36
Change+$0.05 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.21M
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 343M vs. FCIVX (145M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than RGFTX: FCIVX (3.25) vs RGFTX (2.66). FCIVX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FCIVX (9 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FCIVX (12.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: RGFTX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. FCIVX (-9.53). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : -3.87 vs. FCIVX (-14.08).
| FCIVX | RGFTX | FCIVX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.127 | 3.769 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145M | 343M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 2.66 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.53 | 16.32 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.67 | 12.80 | -154% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.08 | -3.87 | 364% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |