Ad is loading...
FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs RGFTX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$15.79
Change+$0.29 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.22M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.68
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.34M
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. RGFTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 347M vs. FCIVX (116M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than RGFTX: FCIVX (3.18) vs RGFTX (3.01). FCIVX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FCIVX (9 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: RGFTX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. FCIVX (-3.57). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.00 vs. FCIVX (21.09).
| FCIVX | RGFTX | FCIVX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.24 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.774 | 7.759 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 347M | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 3.01 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.57 | 15.18 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.28 | 9.90 | -175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.09 | 44.00 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers