Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. RGFTX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 592M vs. FCIVX (119M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FCIVX: RGFTX (2.68) vs FCIVX (2.16). FCIVX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FCIVX (10 years) vs RGFTX (10 years). RGFTX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.92). RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: RGFTX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. FCIVX (-19.37). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 15.78 vs. FCIVX (-21.93).
| FCIVX | RGFTX | FCIVX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.22 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.201 | 5.749 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 119M | 592M | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 2.68 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.37 | 1.50 | -1,291% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.51 | 36.26 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.93 | 15.78 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement