Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 601M vs. FCIVX (150M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FCIVX: RGFTX (3.16) vs FCIVX (2.54). FCIVX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FCIVX (10 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.92). RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: RGFTX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. FCIVX (-10.61). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.10 vs. FCIVX (-16.24).
| FCIVX | RGFTX | FCIVX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.22 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.685 | 10.056 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 601M | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.16 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.61 | 9.42 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.27 | 35.48 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.24 | 19.10 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers