Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs RGFTX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.44
Change-$0.05 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.34M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.04M
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. RGFTX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 346M vs. FCIVX (146M). RGFTX (3.12) and FCIVX (3.07) have matching dividends . FCIVX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FCIVX (9 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: RGFTX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. FCIVX (-6.82). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 24.43 vs. FCIVX (10.43).
| FCIVX | RGFTX | FCIVX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.24 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.480 | 15.922 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 346M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.12 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.82 | 12.60 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.59 | 23.62 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.43 | 24.43 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers