Ad is loading...
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$15.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.72M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets852.34M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Mar 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a StrongBuy and TOLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 852M vs. FCIVX (127M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLSX: FCIVX (3.21) vs TOLSX (2.48). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. FCIVX (-4.28). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 43.62 vs. FCIVX (23.49).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.028 | 5.948 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127M | 852M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 2.48 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.28 | 12.12 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.73 | -4.25 | 371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.49 | 43.62 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...