Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.33M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.36
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets897.39M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and TOLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 897M vs. FCIVX (86.3M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLSX: FCIVX (3.11) vs TOLSX (2.32). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. FCIVX (-1.07). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.95 vs. FCIVX (12.20).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.755 | 9.664 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.3M | 897M | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 2.32 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.07 | 10.78 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.08 | 6.13 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.20 | 18.95 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement