Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCKTX vs MFJBX
FCKTX vs MFJBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCKTX vs. MFJBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCKTX is a Hold and MFJBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFJBX pays higher dividends than FCKTX: MFJBX (1.72) vs FCKTX (1.03). FCKTX was incepted earlier than MFJBX: FCKTX (9 years) vs MFJBX (9 years). MFJBX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FCKTX (0.39). MFJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FCKTX (5.00). MFJBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCKTX: MFJBX (1000) vs FCKTX (1000000). FCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.04 vs. MFJBX (11.92). MFJBX (52.02) and FCKTX (49.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCKTX | MFJBX | FCKTX / MFJBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.58 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.93 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.592 | 13.827 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.72 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.04 | 11.92 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.56 | 40.99 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.60 | 52.02 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement