Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCKTX vs MFJBX
FCKTX vs MFJBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCKTX vs. MFJBX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCKTX is a Hold and MFJBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCKTX has more cash in the bank: 18B vs. MFJBX (251M). MFJBX pays higher dividends than FCKTX: MFJBX (1.69) vs FCKTX (0.98). FCKTX was incepted earlier than MFJBX: FCKTX (9 years) vs MFJBX (9 years). MFJBX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FCKTX (0.39). MFJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FCKTX (5.00). MFJBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCKTX: MFJBX (1000) vs FCKTX (1000000). FCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. MFJBX (6.92). FCKTX (39.17) and MFJBX (38.90) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCKTX | MFJBX | FCKTX / MFJBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.57 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.91 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.854 | 10.556 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18B | 251M | 7,171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.69 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | 6.92 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.29 | 33.56 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.17 | 38.90 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement