Ad is loading...
FCLAX vs FSRFX
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLAX vs FSRFX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
Price$47.03
Change+$0.20 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.85M
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$93.13
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.83M
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLAX vs. FSRFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLAX is a Buy and FSRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLAX has more cash in the bank: 644M vs. FSRFX (438M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLAX: FSRFX (1.46) vs FCLAX (0.16). FCLAX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLAX (29 years) vs FSRFX (39 years). FCLAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). FCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FCLAX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. FSRFX (-12.96). FCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.25 vs. FSRFX (49.95).
| FCLAX | FSRFX | FCLAX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.082 | -10.117 | -30% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 644M | 438M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.46 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | -12.96 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.97 | -0.22 | -18,093% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.25 | 49.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.62 | 10.56 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers