Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLAX vs FSRFX
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLAX vs FSRFX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
Price$54.57
Change+$0.36 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$103.28
Change-$0.71 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.59M
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLAX vs. FSRFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLAX is a Hold and FSRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLAX has more cash in the bank: 1.64B vs. FSRFX (467M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLAX: FSRFX (1.25) vs FCLAX (0.13). FCLAX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLAX (29 years) vs FSRFX (39 years). FCLAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). FCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FCLAX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. FSRFX (-10.07). FCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.84 vs. FSRFX (17.65).
| FCLAX | FSRFX | FCLAX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.326 | 0.376 | 5,146% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 467M | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.25 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | -10.07 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.60 | 9.40 | 570% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.84 | 17.65 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.34 | 31.43 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement