FCLIF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
12.31M
MLPNF
Price
$1.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
159.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCLIF vs MLPNF

Header iconFCLIF vs MLPNF Comparison
Open Charts FCLIF vs MLPNFBanner chart's image
Full Circle Lithium
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$2.65K
Capitalization12.31M
MILLENNIAL POTASH
Price$1.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$288.81K
Capitalization159.56M
FCLIF vs MLPNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCLIF vs. MLPNF commentary
Aug 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLIF is a Hold and MLPNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FCLIF: $0.16 vs. MLPNF: $1.43)
Brand notoriety: FCLIF and MLPNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCLIF: 1452% vs. MLPNF: 156%
Market capitalization -- FCLIF: $12.31M vs. MLPNF: $159.56M
FCLIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.31M. MLPNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $159.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCLIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLPNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FCLIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLPNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCLIF and MLPNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCLIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLPNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCLIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MLPNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLPNF is a better buy in the short-term than FCLIF.

Price Growth

FCLIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.51% price change this week, while MLPNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +20.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +77.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+0.81% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPNF($160M) has a higher market cap than FCLIF($12.3M). MLPNF YTD gains are higher at: 560.661 vs. FCLIF (-2.403). FCLIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.38M vs. MLPNF (-3.98M). MLPNF has more cash in the bank: 7.5M vs. FCLIF (722K). FCLIF has less debt than MLPNF: FCLIF (0) vs MLPNF (88.9K). FCLIF has higher revenues than MLPNF: FCLIF (600K) vs MLPNF (0).
FCLIFMLPNFFCLIF / MLPNF
Capitalization12.3M160M8%
EBITDA-2.38M-3.98M60%
Gain YTD-2.403560.661-0%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue600K0-
Total Cash722K7.5M10%
Total Debt088.9K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCLIFMLPNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WLFC146.550.10
+0.07%
Willis Lease Finance Corp
MTH74.89-0.10
-0.13%
Meritage Homes Corporation
SLSN3.48-0.02
-0.57%
Solesence Inc
HCA404.26-5.92
-1.44%
HCA Healthcare
IGC0.35-0.01
-2.06%
IGC Pharma

FCLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCLIF and LZM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCLIF and LZM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCLIF
1D Price
Change %
FCLIF100%
N/A
LZM - FCLIF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
VLTLF - FCLIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLPNF - FCLIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USGO - FCLIF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
EUEMF - FCLIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLPNF and SIERF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLPNF and SIERF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLPNF
1D Price
Change %
MLPNF100%
+2.88%
SIERF - MLPNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAAF - MLPNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCMF - MLPNF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
USGO - MLPNF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
CAPFF - MLPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More