Ad is loading...
FCLTX vs FSRFX
FCLTX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs FSRFX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M
Price$45.00
Change+$0.20 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.85M
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$93.13
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.83M
FCLTX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs. FSRFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Buy and FSRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 644M vs. FSRFX (438M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLTX: FSRFX (1.46) vs FCLTX (0.00). FCLTX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLTX (29 years) vs FSRFX (39 years). FCLTX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). FCLTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FCLTX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. FSRFX (-12.96). FCLTX (52.12) and FSRFX (49.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCLTX | FSRFX | FCLTX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.69 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.69 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.965 | -10.117 | -29% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 644M | 438M | 147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | -12.96 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.27 | -0.22 | -17,324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.12 | 49.95 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.25 | 10.56 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...