Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLTX vs FSRFX
FCLTX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs FSRFX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M
Price$51.75
Change-$0.48 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets806.13M
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$105.28
Change+$0.24 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465.88M
FCLTX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs. FSRFX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Hold and FSRFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 806M vs. FSRFX (466M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLTX: FSRFX (1.32) vs FCLTX (0.00). FCLTX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLTX (29 years) vs FSRFX (39 years). FCLTX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). FCLTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FCLTX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.81 vs. FSRFX (0.44). FCLTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.21 vs. FSRFX (31.49).
| FCLTX | FSRFX | FCLTX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.69 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.69 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.041 | 1.389 | 1,443% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 466M | 173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.81 | 0.44 | 4,995% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.43 | 3.94 | 1,281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.21 | 31.49 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.57 | 28.99 | 154% |