Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs FCMQX
FCMAX vs FCMQX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs FCMQX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$12.31
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc I
Price$12.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
FCMAX vs FCMQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. FCMQX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and FCMQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX (1.76B) and FCMQX (1.76B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCMQX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: FCMQX (2.86) vs FCMAX (2.63). FCMAX was incepted earlier than FCMQX: FCMAX (23 years) vs FCMQX (23 years). FCMAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FCMQX (0.53). FCMAX (22.00) and FCMQX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCMAX (0) and FCMQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCMQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.89 vs. FCMAX (1.65). FCMQX return over 5 years is better than : 4.24 vs. FCMAX (2.99).
| FCMAX | FCMQX | FCMAX / FCMQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.53 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.53 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.698 | 2.859 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 1.76B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.86 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.65 | 1.89 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.21 | 13.00 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.99 | 4.24 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.73 | 23.70 | 87% |