Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMAX vs FCTFX
FCMAX vs FCTFX Comparison
Open Charts FCMAX vs FCTFX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc A
Price$11.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
Fidelity California Municipal Income
Price$11.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
FCMAX vs FCTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMAX vs. FCTFX commentary
Aug 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMAX is a Hold and FCTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMAX (1.75B) and FCTFX (1.75B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCTFX pays higher dividends than FCMAX: FCTFX (2.95) vs FCMAX (2.61). FCMAX was incepted earlier than FCTFX: FCMAX (23 years) vs FCTFX (41 years). FCMAX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FCTFX (0.43). FCMAX (22.00) and FCTFX (22.00) have comparable annual turnover. FCMAX (0) and FCTFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.09 vs. FCMAX (-0.24). FCTFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.29 vs. FCMAX (-0.30).
| FCMAX | FCTFX | FCMAX / FCTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.43 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.43 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.388 | -0.199 | 195% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 1.75B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 2.95 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.24 | 0.09 | -258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.51 | 7.57 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.30 | 1.29 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.14 | 21.12 | 81% |