Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCMQX vs FKTFX
FCMQX vs FKTFX Comparison
Open Charts FCMQX vs FKTFX
Fidelity Advisor California Muni Inc I
Price$12.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.9B
FCMQX vs FKTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCMQX vs. FKTFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMQX is a Hold and FKTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. FCMQX (1.76B). FKTFX pays higher dividends than FCMQX: FKTFX (3.79) vs FCMQX (2.86). FCMQX was incepted earlier than FKTFX: FCMQX (23 years) vs FKTFX (49 years). FKTFX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FCMQX (0.53). FCMQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FCMQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTFX: FCMQX (0) vs FKTFX (1000). FCMQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.97 vs. FKTFX (0.06). FCMQX return over 5 years is better than : 4.41 vs. FKTFX (-1.18).
| FCMQX | FKTFX | FCMQX / FKTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.60 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.60 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 49 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.026 | 1.219 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 12.9B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 3.79 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.97 | 0.06 | 3,434% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.19 | 11.22 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.41 | -1.18 | -374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.90 | 6.54 | 365% |