FCN
Price
$164.69
Change
+$1.70 (+1.04%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.4B
60 days until earnings call
MMS
Price
$66.00
Change
-$0.76 (-1.14%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.12B
74 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FCN vs MMS

Header iconFCN vs MMS Comparison
Open Charts FCN vs MMSBanner chart's image
FTI Consulting
Price$164.69
Change+$1.70 (+1.04%)
Volume$797.67K
Capitalization7.4B
MAXIMUS
Price$66.00
Change-$0.76 (-1.14%)
Volume$680.6K
Capitalization5.12B
FCN vs MMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCN vs. MMS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCN is a Hold and MMS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FCN: $164.69 vs. MMS: $66.00)
Brand notoriety: FCN and MMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCN: 307% vs. MMS: 91%
Market capitalization -- FCN: $7.4B vs. MMS: $5.12B
FCN [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $7.4B. MMS’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $5.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCN and MMS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCN is a better buy in the short-term than MMS.

Price Growth

FCN (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -12.22% price change this week, while MMS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

MMS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.81% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCN($7.4B) has a higher market cap than MMS($5.12B). MMS (27.27) and FCN (26.99) have similar P/E ratio . MMS YTD gains are higher at: -11.192 vs. FCN (-13.834). MMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 472M vs. FCN (420M). FCN has more cash in the bank: 329M vs. MMS (104M). FCN has less debt than MMS: FCN (258M) vs MMS (1.48B). MMS has higher revenues than FCN: MMS (4.98B) vs FCN (3.49B).
FCNMMSFCN / MMS
Capitalization7.4B5.12B144%
EBITDA420M472M89%
Gain YTD-13.834-11.192124%
P/E Ratio26.9927.2799%
Revenue3.49B4.98B70%
Total Cash329M104M316%
Total Debt258M1.48B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCN vs MMS: Fundamental Ratings
FCN
MMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8764
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
5551
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8583
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8994
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MMS's Valuation (24) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCN (72). This means that MMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCN’s over the last 12 months.

FCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMS (100). This means that FCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMS’s over the last 12 months.

MMS's SMR Rating (51) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FCN (55). This means that MMS’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.

MMS's Price Growth Rating (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FCN (85). This means that MMS’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.

FCN's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as MMS (94). This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to MMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNMMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GXC87.981.44
+1.66%
SPDR® S&P China ETF
JMUB50.460.09
+0.18%
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
HYXU48.11-0.11
-0.22%
iShares International High Yield Bd ETF
ILIT9.07-0.09
-0.98%
iShares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
CNRG59.03-2.19
-3.57%
SPDR® Kensho Clean Power ETF

FCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCN and CBZ have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCN and CBZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCN
1D Price
Change %
FCN100%
+1.04%
CBZ - FCN
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
MSA - FCN
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
FA - FCN
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
MMS - FCN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
RELX - FCN
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
More

MMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMS has been loosely correlated with DNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMS jumps, then DNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMS
1D Price
Change %
MMS100%
-1.14%
DNB - MMS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
BV - MMS
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
EFX - MMS
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
ICFI - MMS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
GHC - MMS
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
More