Ad is loading...
FCNAX vs FSRPX
FCNAX vs FSRPX Comparison
Open Charts FCNAX vs FSRPX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret A
Price$39.20
Change+$0.90 (+2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets432.07M
Fidelity Select Retailing
Price$17.62
Change+$0.20 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
FCNAX vs FSRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNAX vs. FSRPX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNAX is a Buy and FSRPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.68B vs. FCNAX (432M). FSRPX pays higher dividends than FCNAX: FSRPX (0.13) vs FCNAX (0.00). FCNAX was incepted earlier than FSRPX: FCNAX (29 years) vs FSRPX (39 years). FCNAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.66). FSRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FCNAX (25.00). FCNAX (0) and FSRPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNAX (500) and FSRPX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FCNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.30 vs. FSRPX (-7.96). FCNAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. FSRPX (10.36).
| FCNAX | FSRPX | FCNAX / FSRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.66 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.66 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.804 | -14.900 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 432M | 2.68B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.30 | -7.96 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.31 | -7.30 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 10.36 | 383% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.55 | 81.96 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...