Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGEBX
FCNKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$24.22
Change-$0.24 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.15B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.56
Change-$0.76 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.04B
FCNKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FCNKX (171B). FCNKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FCNKX (0.10) vs RGEBX (0.00). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FCNKX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.56). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FCNKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.16 vs. RGEBX (13.67). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 40.17 vs. RGEBX (33.24).
| FCNKX | RGEBX | FCNKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.787 | 14.166 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171B | 329B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 13.67 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.54 | 52.58 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.17 | 33.24 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.73 | 94.86 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement