Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGEBX
FCNKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$24.13
Change-$0.21 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.17B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.95
Change-$0.57 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
FCNKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. FCNKX (176B). FCNKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FCNKX (0.10) vs RGEBX (0.00). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FCNKX (18 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.56). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FCNKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. RGEBX (6.39). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 42.58 vs. RGEBX (29.69).
| FCNKX | RGEBX | FCNKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.355 | 14.712 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 176B | 330B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 6.39 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.62 | 59.35 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.58 | 29.69 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.04 | 80.59 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement