Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGEBX
FCNKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$24.67
Change-$0.15 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.15B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$0.80 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
FCNKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FCNKX (171B). FCNKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FCNKX (0.10) vs RGEBX (0.00). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FCNKX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.56). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FCNKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.43 vs. RGEBX (12.10). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 53.83 vs. RGEBX (43.73).
| FCNKX | RGEBX | FCNKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.630 | 16.601 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171B | 338B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.43 | 12.10 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.79 | 70.06 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.83 | 43.73 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.39 | 105.49 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement