Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGAHX
FCNTX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGAHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$84.33
Change+$0.58 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
FCNTX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGAHX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FCNTX (173B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: RGAHX (0.47) vs FCNTX (0.05). FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FCNTX (58 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FCNTX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FCNTX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.19 vs. RGAHX (14.30). FCNTX (39.96) and RGAHX (38.19) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCNTX | RGAHX | FCNTX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.44 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.44 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.503 | 14.828 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173B | 328B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.47 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.19 | 14.30 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.42 | 52.83 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.96 | 38.19 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement