Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs TRBCX
FCNTX vs TRBCX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Price$210.73
Change+$0.20 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.54B
FCNTX vs TRBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. TRBCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a StrongBuy and TRBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 173B vs. TRBCX (67.5B). FCNTX pays higher dividends than TRBCX: FCNTX (0.05) vs TRBCX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than TRBCX: FCNTX (58 years) vs TRBCX (32 years). TRBCX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.63). FCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. TRBCX (15.70). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX: FCNTX (0) vs TRBCX (2500). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.58 vs. TRBCX (12.57). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.05 vs. TRBCX (29.59).
| FCNTX | TRBCX | FCNTX / TRBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.69 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.69 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.169 | 13.030 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173B | 67.5B | 256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.58 | 12.57 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.41 | 64.64 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.05 | 29.59 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.00 | 194.34 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement