Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs TRBCX
FCNTX vs TRBCX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Price$190.24
Change-$0.94 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.66B
FCNTX vs TRBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. TRBCX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and TRBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. TRBCX (63.7B). FCNTX pays higher dividends than TRBCX: FCNTX (0.06) vs TRBCX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than TRBCX: FCNTX (58 years) vs TRBCX (32 years). TRBCX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.63). FCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. TRBCX (15.70). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRBCX: FCNTX (0) vs TRBCX (2500). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.69 vs. TRBCX (2.70). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.62 vs. TRBCX (39.75).
| FCNTX | TRBCX | FCNTX / TRBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.69 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.69 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.419 | 2.641 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157B | 63.7B | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.69 | 2.70 | 396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.31 | 63.51 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.62 | 39.75 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.14 | 159.00 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement