FCOB
Price
$16.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
22.08M
MLYNF
Price
$2.43
Change
+$0.44 (+22.11%)
Updated
Jan 6 closing price
Capitalization
23.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCOB vs MLYNF

Header iconFCOB vs MLYNF Comparison
Open Charts FCOB vs MLYNFBanner chart's image
1st Colonial Ban
Price$16.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$173
Capitalization22.08M
Malayan Banking Berhad
Price$2.43
Change+$0.44 (+22.11%)
Volume$1.88K
Capitalization23.78B
FCOB vs MLYNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCOB vs. MLYNF commentary
Jul 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOB is a StrongBuy and MLYNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FCOB: $16.25 vs. MLYNF: $2.43)
Brand notoriety: FCOB and MLYNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCOB: 2% vs. MLYNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FCOB: $22.08M vs. MLYNF: $23.78B
FCOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.08M. MLYNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCOB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLYNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCOB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLYNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCOB is a better buy in the long-term than MLYNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCOB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FCOB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FCOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while MLYNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCOB is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.46% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLYNF($23.8B) has a higher market cap than FCOB($22.1M). MLYNF has higher P/E ratio than FCOB: MLYNF (9.13) vs FCOB (5.70). MLYNF YTD gains are higher at: 22.233 vs. FCOB (9.060). FCOB has less debt than MLYNF: FCOB (3.17M) vs MLYNF (53.9B). MLYNF has higher revenues than FCOB: MLYNF (25.9B) vs FCOB (20.8M).
FCOBMLYNFFCOB / MLYNF
Capitalization22.1M23.8B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.06022.23341%
P/E Ratio5.709.1362%
Revenue20.8M25.9B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.17M53.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCOB vs MLYNF: Fundamental Ratings
FCOB
MLYNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5145
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1938
SMR RATING
1..100
464
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3634
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCOB's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLYNF (81). This means that FCOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLYNF’s over the last 12 months.

FCOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as MLYNF (38). This means that FCOB’s stock grew similarly to MLYNF’s over the last 12 months.

MLYNF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCOB (46). This means that MLYNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCOB’s over the last 12 months.

FCOB's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MLYNF (55). This means that FCOB’s stock grew similarly to MLYNF’s over the last 12 months.

MLYNF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FCOB (36). This means that MLYNF’s stock grew similarly to FCOB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCOBMLYNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HMLPF17.400.40
+2.35%
Hoegh LNG Partners LP
SURRY3.00N/A
N/A
Sun Art Retail Group Ltd.
CLILF2.10N/A
N/A
Capitaland Investment Ltd.
ACWRF0.09N/A
N/A
Acceleware Ltd.
IPMLF3.16-0.05
-1.56%
Imperial Metals Corp.

FCOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCOB and BKQNF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCOB and BKQNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCOB
1D Price
Change %
FCOB100%
N/A
BKQNF - FCOB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOME - FCOB
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
MLYNF - FCOB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSI - FCOB
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPI - FCOB
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLYNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLYNF has been loosely correlated with BKAHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLYNF jumps, then BKAHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLYNF
1D Price
Change %
MLYNF100%
N/A
BKAHF - MLYNF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CITZ - MLYNF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RBNK - MLYNF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
THVB - MLYNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.47%
FCOB - MLYNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More