Advertisement
FCOM vs LYV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and LYV is a Hold.
LYV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | LYV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ECEOX | 12.06 | N/A | N/A |
| Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Open | |||
| MFWHX | 17.59 | N/A | N/A |
| MFS Global Total Return R3 | |||
| JFNAX | 64.58 | -0.27 | -0.42% |
| Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences A | |||
| RLBAX | 36.59 | -0.20 | -0.54% |
| American Funds American Balanced R1 | |||
| BRWVX | 27.30 | -0.21 | -0.76% |
| MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R6 | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 67% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| LLYVK - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||
LYV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYV has been closely correlated with LLYVK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYV jumps, then LLYVK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYV | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| LLYVK - LYV | 90% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| LLYVA - LYV | 89% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| FOX - LYV | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| FOXA - LYV | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| NWS - LYV | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||