Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOQX vs TFBIX
FCOQX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts FCOQX vs TFBIX
Franklin CO Tax Free Income A
Price$10.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets471.78M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.67
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
FCOQX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOQX vs. TFBIX commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOQX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. FCOQX (472M). TFBIX pays higher dividends than FCOQX: TFBIX (3.53) vs FCOQX (3.17). FCOQX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: FCOQX (7 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). FCOQX (0.85) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). TFBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FCOQX (13.97). FCOQX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: FCOQX (1000) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.59 vs. FCOQX (-2.41). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.78 vs. FCOQX (-6.59).
| FCOQX | TFBIX | FCOQX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.41 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.41 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.240 | -2.673 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 472M | 2.25B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 3.53 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.41 | -1.59 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.63 | 4.81 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.59 | 0.78 | -841% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement