Ad is loading...
FCQTX vs FFBSX
FCQTX vs FFBSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQTX vs. FFBSX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQTX is a Hold and FFBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. FFBSX (322M). FFBSX pays higher dividends than FCQTX: FFBSX (1.58) vs FCQTX (1.14). FCQTX was incepted earlier than FFBSX: FCQTX (5 years) vs FFBSX (6 years). FFBSX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FCQTX (0.39). FFBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FCQTX (4.00). FFBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCQTX: FFBSX (0) vs FCQTX (1000000). FCQTX (6.71) and FFBSX (6.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FCQTX return over 5 years is better than : 60.24 vs. FFBSX (54.02).
| FCQTX | FFBSX | FCQTX / FFBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.50 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.50 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.144 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 322M | 1,315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.58 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 6.51 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.36 | 22.92 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.24 | 54.02 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |