Ad is loading...
FCQTX vs RDLTX
FCQTX vs RDLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQTX vs. RDLTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQTX is a Hold and RDLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQTX (4.23B) and RDLTX (4.23B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCQTX pays higher dividends than RDLTX: FCQTX (1.14) vs RDLTX (0.84). FCQTX was incepted earlier than RDLTX: FCQTX (5 years) vs RDLTX (5 years). RDLTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FCQTX (0.39). FCQTX (4.00) and RDLTX (4.00) have comparable annual turnover. RDLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCQTX: RDLTX (250) vs FCQTX (1000000). FCQTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. RDLTX (6.32). FCQTX (60.24) and RDLTX (58.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCQTX | RDLTX | FCQTX / RDLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.74 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.74 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.144 | -1.322 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 4.23B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.84 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 6.32 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.36 | 23.99 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.24 | 58.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...