Ad is loading...
FCQTX vs RHLTX
FCQTX vs RHLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCQTX vs. RHLTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCQTX is a Hold and RHLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQTX (4.23B) and RHLTX (4.23B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCQTX pays higher dividends than RHLTX: FCQTX (1.14) vs RHLTX (1.02). FCQTX was incepted earlier than RHLTX: FCQTX (5 years) vs RHLTX (5 years). RHLTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FCQTX (0.39). FCQTX (4.00) and RHLTX (4.00) have comparable annual turnover. RHLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCQTX: RHLTX (250) vs FCQTX (1000000). FCQTX (6.71) and RHLTX (6.48) have marching annual gain over last year. FCQTX (60.24) and RHLTX (60.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCQTX | RHLTX | FCQTX / RHLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.53 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.53 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.144 | -1.261 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 4.23B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.02 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 6.48 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.36 | 24.68 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.24 | 60.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |