FCREY
Price
$3.18
Change
-$1.12 (-26.05%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
SMID
Price
$32.16
Change
+$2.74 (+9.31%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
247.2M
Ad is loading...

FCREY vs SMID

Header iconFCREY vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts FCREY vs SMIDBanner chart's image
Fletcher Building
Price$3.18
Change-$1.12 (-26.05%)
Volume$4.45K
Capitalization2.69B
Smith-Midland
Price$32.16
Change+$2.74 (+9.31%)
Volume$8.45K
Capitalization247.2M
FCREY vs SMID Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCREY vs. SMID commentary
May 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCREY is a Hold and SMID is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FCREY: $3.18 vs. SMID: $32.16)
Brand notoriety: FCREY and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCREY: 123% vs. SMID: 93%
Market capitalization -- FCREY: $2.69B vs. SMID: $247.2M
FCREY [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.69B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $247.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCREY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FCREY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the long-term than FCREY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMID’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMID’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FCREY (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +11.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMID is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.24% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCREY($2.69B) has a higher market cap than SMID($247M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than FCREY: SMID (427.45) vs FCREY (13.40). FCREY YTD gains are higher at: 7.797 vs. SMID (-27.665). FCREY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1B vs. SMID (3.43M). FCREY has higher revenues than SMID: FCREY (8.72B) vs SMID (57.7M).
FCREYSMIDFCREY / SMID
Capitalization2.69B247M1,087%
EBITDA1B3.43M29,138%
Gain YTD7.797-27.665-28%
P/E Ratio13.40427.453%
Revenue8.72B57.7M15,109%
Total CashN/A5.85M-
Total DebtN/A5.94M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCREY vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
FCREY
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
395
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
9750
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCREY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (73). This means that FCREY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCREY (100). This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCREY’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCREY (97). This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCREY’s over the last 12 months.

FCREY's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SMID (82). This means that FCREY’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

FCREY's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SMID (100). This means that FCREY’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA287.216.69
+2.38%
Tesla
SPY566.768.29
+1.48%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X96910.070000417.734380
+0.43%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.480.05
+0.18%
GameStop Corp
AAPL205.35-7.97
-3.74%
Apple

FCREY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCREY and JHX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCREY and JHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCREY
1D Price
Change %
FCREY100%
N/A
JHX - FCREY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
CAPS - FCREY
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
TGLS - FCREY
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
HCMLY - FCREY
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
SMID - FCREY
14%
Poorly correlated
+9.31%
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+9.31%
BCC - SMID
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.71%
USLM - SMID
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
EXP - SMID
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
KNF - SMID
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
CRH - SMID
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
More