Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSSX vs SKNRX
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts FCSSX vs SKNRX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy
Price$91.41
Change+$0.15 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets526.95M
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy A
Price$5.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets884.61M
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSSX vs. SKNRX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSSX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 885M vs. FCSSX (527M). FCSSX pays higher dividends than SKNRX: FCSSX (12.37) vs SKNRX (2.99). FCSSX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: FCSSX (16 years) vs SKNRX (20 years). SKNRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCSSX (0.00). SKNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FCSSX (0.00). FCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKNRX: FCSSX (0) vs SKNRX (1000). FCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.05 vs. SKNRX (3.61). FCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 91.10 vs. SKNRX (68.60).
| FCSSX | SKNRX | FCSSX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.093 | 5.529 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 527M | 885M | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.37 | 2.99 | 413% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 3.61 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.89 | -7.42 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.10 | 68.60 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.84 | 18.71 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement