Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSSX vs SKNRX
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts FCSSX vs SKNRX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy
Price$94.18
Change-$1.77 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.08M
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy A
Price$5.76
Change-$0.11 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets827.8M
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSSX vs. SKNRX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSSX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 828M vs. FCSSX (568M). SKNRX pays higher dividends than FCSSX: SKNRX (4.27) vs FCSSX (3.56). FCSSX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: FCSSX (16 years) vs SKNRX (21 years). SKNRX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FCSSX (0.00). SKNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FCSSX (0.00). FCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKNRX: FCSSX (0) vs SKNRX (1000). FCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. SKNRX (9.36). FCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 74.16 vs. SKNRX (58.28).
| FCSSX | SKNRX | FCSSX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.39 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.988 | 9.672 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 568M | 828M | 69% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 4.27 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 9.36 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.48 | 8.95 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.16 | 58.28 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.14 | 38.57 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement