Ad is loading...
FCSSX vs SKNRX
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts FCSSX vs SKNRX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy
Price$90.89
Change+$0.88 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.18M
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy A
Price$5.74
Change+$0.05 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets893.59M
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSSX vs. SKNRX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSSX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 894M vs. FCSSX (530M). FCSSX pays higher dividends than SKNRX: FCSSX (12.32) vs SKNRX (2.99). FCSSX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: FCSSX (16 years) vs SKNRX (20 years). SKNRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCSSX (0.00). SKNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FCSSX (0.00). FCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKNRX: FCSSX (0) vs SKNRX (1000). FCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.79 vs. SKNRX (1.05). FCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 92.59 vs. SKNRX (72.60).
| FCSSX | SKNRX | FCSSX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.490 | 4.423 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 894M | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 12.32 | 2.99 | 412% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | 1.05 | 457% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.40 | -10.14 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.59 | 72.60 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.07 | 15.99 | 82% |