Ad is loading...
FCSSX vs SKNRX
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts FCSSX vs SKNRX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy
Price$89.70
Change+$1.54 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.07M
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy A
Price$5.64
Change+$0.09 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets884.73M
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSSX vs. SKNRX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSSX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 885M vs. FCSSX (580M). FCSSX pays higher dividends than SKNRX: FCSSX (11.70) vs SKNRX (2.83). FCSSX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: FCSSX (16 years) vs SKNRX (20 years). SKNRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCSSX (0.00). SKNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FCSSX (0.00). FCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKNRX: FCSSX (0) vs SKNRX (1000). FCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.85 vs. SKNRX (0.84). FCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 87.02 vs. SKNRX (68.03).
| FCSSX | SKNRX | FCSSX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.109 | 2.603 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 885M | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.70 | 2.83 | 413% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 0.84 | 459% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.09 | -15.69 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.02 | 68.03 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 17.34 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers