Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSSX vs SKNRX
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts FCSSX vs SKNRX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy
Price$92.71
Change+$0.92 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets552.37M
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy A
Price$5.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets848.86M
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSSX vs. SKNRX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSSX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 849M vs. FCSSX (552M). FCSSX pays higher dividends than SKNRX: FCSSX (11.91) vs SKNRX (3.21). FCSSX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: FCSSX (16 years) vs SKNRX (21 years). SKNRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FCSSX (0.00). SKNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FCSSX (0.00). FCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKNRX: FCSSX (0) vs SKNRX (1000). FCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. SKNRX (8.09). FCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.14 vs. SKNRX (54.83).
| FCSSX | SKNRX | FCSSX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.089 | 6.631 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 552M | 849M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.91 | 3.21 | 371% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.54 | 8.09 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.77 | -2.04 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.14 | 54.83 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.34 | 34.14 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement