Ad is loading...
FCSSX vs SKNRX
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts FCSSX vs SKNRX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy
Price$90.55
Change-$0.49 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.89M
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy A
Price$5.80
Change-$0.02 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets928.38M
FCSSX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSSX vs. SKNRX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSSX is a Hold and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. FCSSX (560M). FCSSX pays higher dividends than SKNRX: FCSSX (4.44) vs SKNRX (1.79). FCSSX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: FCSSX (15 years) vs SKNRX (20 years). FCSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SKNRX: FCSSX (0) vs SKNRX (1000). FCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. SKNRX (8.52). FCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.23 vs. SKNRX (40.01).
| FCSSX | SKNRX | FCSSX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.095 | 4.693 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 560M | 928M | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.44 | 1.79 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 8.52 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.40 | 4.48 | 322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.23 | 40.01 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.66 | 17.50 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...