Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSTX vs LTCQX
FCSTX vs LTCQX Comparison
Open Charts FCSTX vs LTCQX
Fidelity California Ltd Trm Tax-Free Bd
Price$10.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets609.7M
Thornburg Ca Limited-Term Municipal C2
Price$13.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.34M
FCSTX vs LTCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSTX vs. LTCQX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSTX is a Hold and LTCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSTX has more cash in the bank: 610M vs. LTCQX (285M). LTCQX pays higher dividends than FCSTX: LTCQX (2.68) vs FCSTX (2.11). FCSTX was incepted earlier than LTCQX: FCSTX (20 years) vs LTCQX (5 years). LTCQX (2.89) is less costly to investors than FCSTX (0.30). LTCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.36 vs. FCSTX (15.00). FCSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTCQX: FCSTX (0) vs LTCQX (5000). FCSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.64 vs. LTCQX (3.15). FCSTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.49 vs. LTCQX (2.69).
| FCSTX | LTCQX | FCSTX / LTCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.02 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.89 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.993 | 3.827 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 285M | 214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 2.68 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | 3.15 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.53 | 10.76 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.49 | 2.69 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers