Ad is loading...
FCSTX vs LTCQX
FCSTX vs LTCQX Comparison
Open Charts FCSTX vs LTCQX
Fidelity California Ltd Trm Tax-Free Bd
Price$10.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets554.21M
Thornburg Ca Limited-Term Municipal C2
Price$12.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.75M
FCSTX vs LTCQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSTX vs. LTCQX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSTX is a Hold and LTCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSTX has more cash in the bank: 554M vs. LTCQX (258M). LTCQX pays higher dividends than FCSTX: LTCQX (2.69) vs FCSTX (2.05). FCSTX was incepted earlier than LTCQX: FCSTX (20 years) vs LTCQX (5 years). LTCQX (2.89) is less costly to investors than FCSTX (0.30). LTCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.36 vs. FCSTX (15.00). FCSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTCQX: FCSTX (0) vs LTCQX (5000). FCSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.67 vs. LTCQX (1.41).
| FCSTX | LTCQX | FCSTX / LTCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.02 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.89 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.502 | -0.033 | -1,525% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 554M | 258M | 215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 2.69 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 1.41 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.44 | 6.28 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.32 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...