Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUIX vs VTSAX
FCUIX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts FCUIX vs VTSAX
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity
Price$20.10
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets563.17M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$152.65
Change+$0.67 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
FCUIX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUIX vs. VTSAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUIX is a StrongBuy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. FCUIX (563M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than FCUIX: VTSAX (1.21) vs FCUIX (0.52). FCUIX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: FCUIX (6 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). FCUIX (0.65) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). FCUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). VTSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCUIX: VTSAX (3000) vs FCUIX (1000000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. FCUIX (9.03). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. FCUIX (75.65).
| FCUIX | VTSAX | FCUIX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.04 | 1,625% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.567 | 8.289 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 563M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.21 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 17.75 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.44 | 60.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.65 | 93.55 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 201.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement