Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs IMCG
FCUS vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs IMCG
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$30.85
Change+$0.26 (+0.85%)
Volume$500
Net Assets42.89M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$78.61
Change+$0.04 (+0.05%)
Volume$3.54K
Net Assets3.01B
FCUS vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. IMCG commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and IMCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 3.02B vs. FCUS (42.9M). FCUS has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: FCUS (7.949) vs IMCG (4.678). FCUS was incepted earlier than IMCG: FCUS (3 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover IMCG (35.00) vs IMCG (35.00).
| FCUS | IMCG | FCUS / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 7.949 | 4.678 | 170% |
| Net Assets | 42.9M | 3.02B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.06 | 1,317% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 35.00 | 1,409% |
| Yield | 8.64 | 0.71 | 1,216% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | +1.53% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| KKR - FCUS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| CARR - FCUS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| AFRM - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| CZR - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| TRMB - IMCG | 87% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| SYF - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| DOV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| PNR - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||