Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs IMCG
FCUS vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs IMCG
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$32.89
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.22M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$82.85
Change-$0.60 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.24B
FCUS vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. IMCG commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and IMCG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 3.24B vs. FCUS (46.2M). FCUS has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: FCUS (14.119) vs IMCG (10.402). FCUS was incepted earlier than IMCG: FCUS (3 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover IMCG (35.00) vs IMCG (35.00).
| FCUS | IMCG | FCUS / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 14.119 | 10.402 | 136% |
| Net Assets | 46.2M | 3.24B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.06 | 1,317% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 35.00 | 1,409% |
| Yield | 9.50 | 0.71 | 1,342% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 74% | 15 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| KKR - FCUS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| CARR - FCUS | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| AFRM - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.94% | ||
| CZR - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| DOV - IMCG | 84% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| APO - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| TRMB - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| PNR - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||