Ad is loading...
FCUS vs IWP
FCUS vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs IWP
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$22.40
Change-$1.16 (-4.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.98M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$114.52
Change-$6.05 (-5.02%)
Volume$1.88K
Net Assets16.75B
FCUS vs IWP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. IWP commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 16.8B vs. FCUS (36M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than FCUS: IWP (-4.798) vs FCUS (-18.099). FCUS was incepted earlier than IWP: FCUS (2 years) vs IWP (24 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover IWP (35.00) vs IWP (35.00).
| FCUS | IWP | FCUS / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | -18.099 | -4.798 | 377% |
| Net Assets | 36M | 16.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.23 | 343% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 35.00 | 1,409% |
| Yield | 13.19 | 0.42 | 3,171% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | +1.51% | ||
| VRT - FCUS | 70% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| EME - FCUS | 70% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| FIX - FCUS | 68% Closely correlated | +3.72% | ||
| VST - FCUS | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.05% | ||
| NRG - FCUS | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.41% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | +1.71% | ||
| ARES - IWP | 73% Closely correlated | +3.39% | ||
| EXP - IWP | 72% Closely correlated | +3.39% | ||
| KKR - IWP | 70% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| AWI - IWP | 69% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| HUBB - IWP | 69% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||