Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs IWP
FCUS vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs IWP
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$31.06
Change+$0.47 (+1.54%)
Volume$3.14K
Net Assets42.89M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$134.74
Change+$0.52 (+0.39%)
Volume$940.53K
Net Assets19.31B
FCUS vs IWP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. IWP commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 19.3B vs. FCUS (42.9M). FCUS has a higher annual dividend yield than IWP: FCUS (7.949) vs IWP (6.585). FCUS was incepted earlier than IWP: FCUS (3 years) vs IWP (24 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover IWP (24.00) vs IWP (24.00).
| FCUS | IWP | FCUS / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | 7.949 | 6.585 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 42.9M | 19.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.23 | 343% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 24.00 | 2,054% |
| Yield | 8.64 | 0.33 | 2,606% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | +1.53% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| KKR - FCUS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| CARR - FCUS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| AFRM - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| CZR - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y