Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs IWP
FCUS vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs IWP
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$27.33
Change-$0.78 (-2.77%)
Volume$250
Net Assets40.12M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$142.41
Change-$1.62 (-1.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets20.18B
FCUS vs IWP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. IWP commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Buy and IWP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 20.2B vs. FCUS (40.1M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than FCUS: IWP (13.840) vs FCUS (-2.301). FCUS was incepted earlier than IWP: FCUS (3 years) vs IWP (24 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover IWP (24.00) vs IWP (24.00).
| FCUS | IWP | FCUS / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | -2.301 | 13.840 | -17% |
| Net Assets | 40.1M | 20.2B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.23 | 343% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 24.00 | 2,054% |
| Yield | 10.99 | 0.37 | 3,006% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | +2.08% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| KKR - FCUS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CARR - FCUS | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| AFRM - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.09% | ||
| CZR - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y