Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs MDYG
FCUS vs MDYG Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs MDYG
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$30.85
Change+$0.26 (+0.85%)
Volume$500
Net Assets42.89M
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF
Price$88.94
Change+$0.25 (+0.28%)
Volume$78.51K
Net Assets2.32B
FCUS vs MDYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. MDYG commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and MDYG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.32B vs. FCUS (42.9M). FCUS has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: FCUS (7.949) vs MDYG (2.956). FCUS was incepted earlier than MDYG: FCUS (3 years) vs MDYG (20 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover MDYG (41.00) vs MDYG (41.00).
| FCUS | MDYG | FCUS / MDYG | |
| Gain YTD | 7.949 | 2.956 | 269% |
| Net Assets | 42.9M | 2.32B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.15 | 527% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 41.00 | 1,202% |
| Yield | 8.64 | 0.78 | 1,110% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | +1.53% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| KKR - FCUS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| CARR - FCUS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| AFRM - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| CZR - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
More | ||||