It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCUV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileITRI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCUV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITRI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FCUV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -11.32% price change this week, while ITRI (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -0.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.35%.
FCUV is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
ITRI is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
FCUV | ITRI | FCUV / ITRI | |
Capitalization | 27.7M | 4.24B | 1% |
EBITDA | -4.25M | 191M | -2% |
Gain YTD | -84.164 | 47.769 | -176% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 42.41 | - |
Revenue | 841K | 2.17B | 0% |
Total Cash | 1.45M | 302M | 0% |
Total Debt | 1.21M | 487M | 0% |
FCUV | ITRI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FCUV's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as ITRI (63) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that FCUV’s stock grew similarly to ITRI’s over the last 12 months.
ITRI's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100) in the null industry. This means that ITRI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
ITRI's SMR Rating (51) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (97) in the null industry. This means that ITRI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
ITRI's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (85) in the null industry. This means that ITRI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
ITRI's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FCUV (100) in the null industry. This means that ITRI’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
FCUV | ITRI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago81% | 27 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 6 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUV and FARO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUV and FARO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FCUV | 100% | -0.47% | ||
FARO - FCUV | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
ITRI - FCUV | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
MKSI - FCUV | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
ST - FCUV | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
CGNX - FCUV | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITRI has been loosely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITRI jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITRI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ITRI | 100% | -1.25% | ||
MKSI - ITRI | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
BMI - ITRI | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
NOVT - ITRI | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
KEYS - ITRI | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
ESE - ITRI | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More |