FCVT | QCON | FCVT / QCON | |
Gain YTD | 1.688 | 2.999 | 56% |
Net Assets | 70.4M | 48.5M | 145% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.32 | 297% |
Turnover | 100.00 | 63.00 | 159% |
Yield | 1.87 | 2.70 | 69% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
FCVT | QCON | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago76% | 8 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago50% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCVT has been loosely correlated with BTSGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCVT jumps, then BTSGU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FCVT | 100% | +1.51% | ||
BTSGU - FCVT | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.58% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QCON and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QCON and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCON | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QCON | 100% | +0.50% | ||
ECPG - QCON | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
PCG - QCON | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
GTLS - QCON | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
VIAV - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
AEP - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
More |