FCVT | QCON | FCVT / QCON | |
Gain YTD | 10.074 | 6.628 | 152% |
Net Assets | 89.9M | 49.9M | 180% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.32 | 297% |
Turnover | 100.00 | 63.00 | 159% |
Yield | 1.99 | 2.64 | 75% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
FCVT | QCON | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 1 day ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 1 day ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 1 day ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 1 day ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago76% | 3 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 1 day ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 1 day ago52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCVT has been loosely correlated with BTSGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCVT jumps, then BTSGU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FCVT | 100% | +0.79% | ||
BTSGU - FCVT | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QCON and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QCON and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCON | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QCON | 100% | +0.42% | ||
ECPG - QCON | 16% Poorly correlated | +3.52% | ||
PCG - QCON | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
GTLS - QCON | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
VIAV - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
AEP - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
More |