Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs HEOTX
FCWGX vs HEOTX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs HEOTX
FCWGX vs HEOTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. HEOTX (134M). FCWGX pays higher dividends than HEOTX: FCWGX (1.53) vs HEOTX (0.48). FCWGX was incepted earlier than HEOTX: FCWGX (6 years) vs HEOTX (10 years). HEOTX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). HEOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FCWGX (44.00). HEOTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCWGX: HEOTX (0) vs FCWGX (250). HEOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.23 vs. FCWGX (23.37). FCWGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.16 vs. HEOTX (30.93).
| FCWGX | HEOTX | FCWGX / HEOTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.81 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.93 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.539 | 21.152 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 134M | 113,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.48 | 321% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.37 | 27.23 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.97 | 47.45 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.16 | 30.93 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers