Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCWGX vs PGINX
FCWGX vs PGINX Comparison
Open Charts FCWGX vs PGINX
FCWGX vs PGINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCWGX vs. PGINX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCWGX is a Hold and PGINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. PGINX (1.7B). FCWGX pays higher dividends than PGINX: FCWGX (1.53) vs PGINX (0.27). FCWGX was incepted earlier than PGINX: FCWGX (6 years) vs PGINX (18 years). PGINX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PGINX (39.00). FCWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGINX: FCWGX (250) vs PGINX (250000). FCWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.94 vs. PGINX (-4.21). FCWGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.47 vs. PGINX (-1.21).
| FCWGX | PGINX | FCWGX / PGINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.93 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.93 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.931 | 17.425 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 1.7B | 9,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.27 | 565% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.94 | -4.21 | -355% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.91 | 17.67 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.47 | -1.21 | -2,935% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers