Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDAFX vs FSNOX
FDAFX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDAFX vs. FSNOX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDAFX is a Hold and FSNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNOX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. FDAFX (1.11B). FSNOX pays higher dividends than FDAFX: FSNOX (2.39) vs FDAFX (2.09). FDAFX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: FDAFX (22 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FDAFX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSNOX (0.49). FDAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSNOX (14.00). FDAFX (0) and FSNOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. FDAFX (6.11). FSNOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.64 vs. FDAFX (0.69).
| FDAFX | FSNOX | FDAFX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.49 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.49 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.505 | 10.078 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 12.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 2.39 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 7.90 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.51 | 29.24 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.69 | 2.64 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers