FDBC
Price
$40.10
Change
+$0.11 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 6, 03:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
277.7M
MCBS
Price
$27.32
Change
-$0.21 (-0.76%)
Updated
Aug 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
629.13M
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDBC vs MCBS

Header iconFDBC vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts FDBC vs MCBSBanner chart's image
Fidelity D & D Ban
Price$40.10
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
Volume$100
Capitalization277.7M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$27.32
Change-$0.21 (-0.76%)
Volume$100
Capitalization629.13M
FDBC vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDBC vs. MCBS commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBC is a Hold and MCBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FDBC: $39.99 vs. MCBS: $27.53)
Brand notoriety: FDBC and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDBC: 45% vs. MCBS: 95%
Market capitalization -- FDBC: $277.7M vs. MCBS: $629.13M
FDBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $277.7M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $629.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FDBC and MCBS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDBC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDBC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than FDBC.

Price Growth

FDBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.24% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDBC is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($629M) has a higher market cap than FDBC($278M). FDBC has higher P/E ratio than MCBS: FDBC (14.75) vs MCBS (11.86). MCBS YTD gains are higher at: -11.725 vs. FDBC (-16.555). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. FDBC (28.4M). FDBC has less debt than MCBS: FDBC (134M) vs MCBS (334M). MCBS has higher revenues than FDBC: MCBS (118M) vs FDBC (72.7M).
FDBCMCBSFDBC / MCBS
Capitalization278M629M44%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.555-11.725141%
P/E Ratio14.7511.86124%
Revenue72.7M118M62%
Total Cash28.4M251M11%
Total Debt134M334M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDBC vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
FDBC
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5272
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9432
SMR RATING
1..100
4933
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8176
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8976
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDBC's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (87) in the null industry. This means that FDBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDBC (94) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDBC’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FDBC (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FDBC’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FDBC (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FDBC’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FDBC (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FDBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDBCMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNUSX18.04N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Developed International Value L
RCEYX58.85N/A
N/A
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Y
FDETX27.68N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development O
PGUAX15.84N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras A
DURIX13.99N/A
N/A
DWS ESG International Core Eq Instl

FDBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDBC has been closely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDBC jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDBC
1D Price
Change %
FDBC100%
-0.42%
PFIS - FDBC
71%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
FNLC - FDBC
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
WTBA - FDBC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
NWFL - FDBC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
MCBS - FDBC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with SBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then SBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
+0.24%
SBSI - MCBS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
TCBK - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
MBWM - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
AROW - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
IBOC - MCBS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
More