FDBC
Price
$52.60
Change
+$0.14 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
305.53M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCBS
Price
$35.38
Change
+$0.40 (+1.14%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDBC vs MCBS

FDBC vs MCBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDBC vs. MCBS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBC is a Hold and MCBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FDBC: $52.60 vs. MCBS: $35.38)
Brand notoriety: FDBC and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDBC: 96% vs. MCBS: 84%
Market capitalization -- FDBC: $305.53M vs. MCBS: $1.01B
FDBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $305.53M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the long-term than FDBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDBC is a better buy in the short-term than MCBS.

Price Growth

FDBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($1.01B) has a higher market cap than FDBC($306M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than FDBC: MCBS (12.28) vs FDBC (10.00). MCBS YTD gains are higher at: 36.747 vs. FDBC (23.143). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. FDBC (25.5M). FDBC has less debt than MCBS: FDBC (15.6M) vs MCBS (440M). MCBS has higher revenues than FDBC: MCBS (168M) vs FDBC (94.9M).
FDBCMCBSFDBC / MCBS
Capitalization306M1.01B30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.14336.74763%
P/E Ratio10.0012.2881%
Revenue94.9M168M56%
Total Cash25.5M279M9%
Total Debt15.6M440M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDBC vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
FDBC
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7829
SMR RATING
1..100
5747
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4834
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDBC's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (63) in the null industry. This means that FDBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDBC (78) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDBC’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FDBC (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FDBC’s over the last 12 months.

FDBC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (44) in the null industry. This means that FDBC’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FDBC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to FDBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDBCMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRSPX80.450.56
+0.70%
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Retire
MADFX39.230.01
+0.03%
Matrix Advisors Dividend
PRDAX13.72-0.07
-0.51%
Principal Diversified Real Asset A
RRRCX24.75-0.13
-0.52%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities C
GSROX17.69-0.10
-0.56%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts R

FDBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDBC has been closely correlated with BHRB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDBC jumps, then BHRB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDBC
1D Price
Change %
FDBC100%
+0.27%
BHRB - FDBC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
MBWM - FDBC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
MCBS - FDBC
69%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
FBIZ - FDBC
68%
Closely correlated
+4.39%
WTBA - FDBC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
More