Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDBTX vs RCJTX
FDBTX vs RCJTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RCJTX commentary
Sep 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RCJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.8B) and RCJTX (4.8B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than RCJTX: FDBTX (2.95) vs RCJTX (2.35). FDBTX was incepted earlier than RCJTX: FDBTX (9 years) vs RCJTX (19 years). RCJTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). FDBTX (6.00) and RCJTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RCJTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.57 vs. RCJTX (7.92). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.70 vs. RCJTX (20.51).
| FDBTX | RCJTX | FDBTX / RCJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.293 | 10.791 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.8B | 4.8B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.35 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.57 | 7.92 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.96 | 21.99 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.70 | 20.51 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers