Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDBTX vs RCJTX
FDBTX vs RCJTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RCJTX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RCJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.8B) and RCJTX (4.8B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than RCJTX: FDBTX (3.01) vs RCJTX (2.39). FDBTX was incepted earlier than RCJTX: FDBTX (9 years) vs RCJTX (19 years). RCJTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). FDBTX (6.00) and RCJTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RCJTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. RCJTX (6.93). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 20.86 vs. RCJTX (17.71).
| FDBTX | RCJTX | FDBTX / RCJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.002 | 8.484 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.8B | 4.8B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 2.39 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 6.93 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.02 | 16.08 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.86 | 17.71 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement