Ad is loading...
FDBTX vs RCJTX
FDBTX vs RCJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RCJTX commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RCJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.89B) and RCJTX (4.89B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than RCJTX: FDBTX (2.97) vs RCJTX (2.33). FDBTX was incepted earlier than RCJTX: FDBTX (8 years) vs RCJTX (18 years). FDBTX (7.00) and RCJTX (7.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RCJTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.38 vs. RCJTX (7.72). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 16.71 vs. RCJTX (13.60).
| FDBTX | RCJTX | FDBTX / RCJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.028 | 2.883 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.89B | 4.89B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.33 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.38 | 7.72 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 6.47 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.71 | 13.60 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers