Ad is loading...
FDBTX vs RCJTX
FDBTX vs RCJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RCJTX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RCJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.75B) and RCJTX (4.75B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than RCJTX: FDBTX (3.15) vs RCJTX (2.50). FDBTX was incepted earlier than RCJTX: FDBTX (8 years) vs RCJTX (18 years). RCJTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). FDBTX (6.00) and RCJTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RCJTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. RCJTX (7.65). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 24.07 vs. RCJTX (20.84).
| FDBTX | RCJTX | FDBTX / RCJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.700 | 2.471 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.75B | 4.75B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 2.50 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 7.65 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.58 | 10.75 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.07 | 20.84 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...