Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDBTX vs RCJTX
FDBTX vs RCJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RCJTX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RCJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.78B) and RCJTX (4.78B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than RCJTX: FDBTX (3.09) vs RCJTX (2.45). FDBTX was incepted earlier than RCJTX: FDBTX (8 years) vs RCJTX (18 years). RCJTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). FDBTX (6.00) and RCJTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RCJTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.64 vs. RCJTX (6.90). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 22.73 vs. RCJTX (19.44).
| FDBTX | RCJTX | FDBTX / RCJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.646 | 5.272 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 4.78B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 2.45 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 6.90 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.14 | 19.17 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.73 | 19.44 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement