Ad is loading...
FDBTX vs RDBTX
FDBTX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RDBTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.74B) and RDBTX (4.74B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than RDBTX: FDBTX (3.16) vs RDBTX (2.78). FDBTX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: FDBTX (8 years) vs RDBTX (18 years). RDBTX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). RDBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RDBTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX (7.42) and RDBTX (7.11) have marching annual gain over last year. FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.72 vs. RDBTX (20.02).
| FDBTX | RDBTX | FDBTX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.64 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.64 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.455 | 2.373 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74B | 4.74B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 2.78 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | 7.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.94 | 11.07 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.72 | 20.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...