Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDBTX vs RDBTX
FDBTX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. RDBTX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and RDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX (4.73B) and RDBTX (4.73B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than RDBTX: FDBTX (3.15) vs RDBTX (2.77). FDBTX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: FDBTX (8 years) vs RDBTX (18 years). RDBTX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). FDBTX (6.00) and RDBTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RDBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: RDBTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.93 vs. RDBTX (6.53). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.40 vs. RDBTX (21.68).
| FDBTX | RDBTX | FDBTX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.64 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.64 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.682 | 3.519 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.73B | 4.73B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 2.77 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 6.53 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.85 | 12.88 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.40 | 21.68 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement