Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCAX vs RGAGX
FDCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FDCAX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation
Price$47.04
Change+$0.19 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.92B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.35
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
FDCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FDCAX (6.92B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FDCAX: RGAGX (0.60) vs FDCAX (0.20). FDCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FDCAX (39 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FDCAX (0.56) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FDCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FDCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FDCAX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. FDCAX (-1.10). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.74 vs. FDCAX (14.84).
| FDCAX | RGAGX | FDCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.30 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.30 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.098 | 15.828 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.92B | 328B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.60 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.10 | 16.26 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.40 | 55.92 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.84 | 39.74 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.02 | 102.72 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers