FDCF
Price
$48.78
Change
+$0.79 (+1.65%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
101.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLC
Price
$112.12
Change
+$1.11 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
23.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDCF vs XLC

Header iconFDCF vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs XLCBanner chart's image
FDCF vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) vs. State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC)

Key Takeaways

  • FDCF is an actively managed thematic ETF targeting disruptive communications companies, offering exposure to innovative tech like AI and semiconductors, while XLC is a passive, market-cap-weighted index tracker focused purely on the U.S. Communication Services sector from the S&P 500.
  • XLC boasts superior cost efficiency with a 0.08% expense ratio compared to FDCF's 0.50%, alongside vastly higher liquidity and AUM ($25B+ vs. ~$100M).
  • FDCF provides broader diversification with ~44 holdings and multi-sector exposure (50% Communication Services, 36% Technology), whereas XLC concentrates in ~23 large-cap holdings, all 100% Communication Services.
  • Top holdings overlap in mega-caps like META and GOOGL, but FDCF uniquely includes growth names like TSM, NVDA, and ANET.
  • FDCF exhibits higher volatility due to its thematic focus but has shown outperformance in recent market cycles driven by AI momentum; XLC offers more stable, broad sector exposure.
  • XLC rebalances quarterly per index methodology, providing predictable structure; FDCF's active management allows flexibility in capturing disruptive trends.

Introduction

In the evolving landscape of technology-driven markets, investors seek targeted exposure to the Communication Services sector amid surging demand for digital infrastructure and content. FDCF and XLC represent contrasting strategies: FDCF as an active, thematic fund chasing disruptive innovators in global communications, and XLC as a passive benchmark for established U.S. large-caps in telecom, media, and interactive services. These ETFs appeal to those rotating into sector exposure amid AI advancements and streaming growth, offering alternatives between high-conviction growth bets and diversified stability. Comparing them highlights trade-offs in cost, risk, and potential upside in a sector poised for sustained capital inflows.

Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) Overview

The Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF), issued by Fidelity Covington Trust, is an actively managed fund seeking long-term capital growth by investing at least 80% of assets in securities of disruptive communications companies. These firms leverage innovative technologies in social media, streaming, next-gen infrastructure, and connected devices to challenge incumbents. With approximately 44 holdings and $102 million in assets under management (AUM), FDCF maintains a non-diversified structure focused on growth-oriented names globally.

Top holdings include TSM (10.8%), GOOGL (9.4%), META (6.3%), ANET (6.3%), AMZN (5.6%), and NVDA (5.6%). Sector allocation spans Communication Services (50%), Technology (36%), Consumer Cyclical (12%), and minor Industrials (1%). The expense ratio stands at 0.50%, reflecting active management costs. Liquidity is moderate with average daily volume around 8,000 shares. Unlike passive peers, FDCF employs proprietary stock selection without fixed rebalancing, enabling adaptability to emerging trends.

State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) Overview

The State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC), managed by State Street Global Advisors, passively tracks the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, comprising U.S. large-cap telecom, media, entertainment, and interactive media firms from the S&P 500. With over $25 billion in AUM and roughly 23 holdings, it offers concentrated exposure to sector leaders via market-cap weighting, capped to prevent dominance.

Top holdings feature META (13.5%), GOOGL (10.2%), GOOG (8.1%), TTWO (4.8%), and DIS (4.8%). Allocation is 100% Communication Services sub-industries like interactive media and wireless telecom. The ultra-low expense ratio of 0.08% underscores its efficient passive structure. XLC rebalances quarterly, ensuring alignment with index changes, and enjoys high liquidity with substantial daily trading volume.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Communication Services sector thrives on AI integration, data center expansion, and streaming proliferation, with ongoing capital flows favoring leaders in interactive media and telecom infrastructure. Macro drivers like interest rate stabilization and AI monetization catalyze growth, as firms invest in generative models and real-time services. Regulatory scrutiny on antitrust and data privacy persists as risks, alongside geopolitical tensions impacting supply chains. Recent cycles show sector resilience, bolstered by AI-driven EPS growth contributing significantly to S&P 500 performance. Thematic tailwinds include RCS adoption and satellite convergence, positioning the sector for multi-year expansion amid tech supercycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, FDCF has edged out XLC, reflecting its tilt toward high-growth tech disruptors amid AI enthusiasm and semiconductor rallies. Over the past year, FDCF delivered approximately 27-29% returns versus XLC's 21-26%, driven by stronger contributions from holdings like NVDA and TSM during sector rotations into innovation themes. XLC's positioning remains steadier, benefiting from mega-cap stability in META and Alphabet amid earnings cycles, though it lags in volatile upswings. FDCF's higher beta introduces greater volatility, while XLC's large-cap focus yields lower drawdowns. Relative strength ties to interest rate expectations and commodity trends supporting infrastructure plays.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FDCF for its structural alignment with AI and disruptive tech momentum, superior diversification via tech exposure, and consistent trend outperformance in recent cycles, despite higher costs and volatility. XLC suits cost-conscious, stability-focused allocations. Probability leans 60% toward FDCF in growth-oriented environments, based on observable momentum and positioning.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FDCF vs. XLC commentary
Jun 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 23.6B vs. FDCF (101M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FDCF (1.476) vs XLC (-4.453). FDCF was incepted earlier than XLC: FDCF (6 years) vs XLC (8 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). XLC has a higher turnover FDCF (23.00) vs FDCF (23.00).
FDCFXLCFDCF / XLC
Gain YTD1.476-4.453-33%
Net Assets101M23.6B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.08625%
Turnover23.0040.0058%
Yield0.031.213%
Fund Existence6 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDCFXLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMTM53.122.06
+4.03%
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
AAPW38.780.49
+1.27%
Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF
DFEB50.080.24
+0.48%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb
PSMR31.840.05
+0.16%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
CTAP28.93-0.05
-0.17%
Simplify US Eq PLUS Mgd Futs Stgy ETF

FDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCF
1D Price
Change %
FDCF100%
+1.65%
TSM - FDCF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.50%
NVDA - FDCF
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
AMZN - FDCF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
ANET - FDCF
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
CDNS - FDCF
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More

XLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLC
1D Price
Change %
XLC100%
+1.00%
META - XLC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
GOOG - XLC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
GOOGL - XLC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
DIS - XLC
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
NWSA - XLC
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
More