Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs XLC
FDCF vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs XLC
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$43.77
Change-$0.30 (-0.68%)
Volume$3.41K
Net Assets74.58M
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$106.01
Change-$0.69 (-0.65%)
Volume$4.77M
Net Assets23.51B
FDCF vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. XLC commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 23.5B vs. FDCF (74.6M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FDCF (15.912) vs XLC (10.094). FDCF was incepted earlier than XLC: FDCF (5 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover XLC (25.00) vs XLC (25.00).
| FDCF | XLC | FDCF / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 15.912 | 10.094 | 158% |
| Net Assets | 74.6M | 23.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.08 | 625% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 25.00 | 140% |
| Yield | 0.04 | 0.98 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| NWS - XLC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||