FDCFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.26M
FNCJF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.31M
Ad is loading...

FDCFF vs FNCJF

Header iconFDCFF vs FNCJF Comparison
Open Charts FDCFF vs FNCJFBanner chart's image
Forum Energy Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$381.99K
Capitalization25.26M
Fancamp Exploration
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization15.31M
FDCFF vs FNCJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FDCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDCFF vs. FNCJF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCFF is a Hold and FNCJF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FDCFF: $0.04 vs. FNCJF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: FDCFF and FNCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDCFF: 121% vs. FNCJF: 80%
Market capitalization -- FDCFF: $25.26M vs. FNCJF: $15.31M
FDCFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $25.26M. FNCJF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $15.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FDCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNCJF is a better buy in the long-term than FDCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDCFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNCJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDCFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FNCJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNCJF is a better buy in the short-term than FDCFF.

Price Growth

FDCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -14.61% price change this week, while FNCJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDCFF($25.3M) has a higher market cap than FNCJF($15.3M). FNCJF YTD gains are higher at: 4.251 vs. FDCFF (-11.919). FNCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.6M vs. FDCFF (-7.19M). FNCJF has more cash in the bank: 26.3M vs. FDCFF (243K). FDCFF (0) and FNCJF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FDCFFFNCJFFDCFF / FNCJF
Capitalization25.3M15.3M165%
EBITDA-7.19M14.6M-49%
Gain YTD-11.9194.251-280%
P/E RatioN/A1.14-
Revenue00-
Total Cash243K26.3M1%
Total DebtN/A150K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDCFF vs FNCJF: Fundamental Ratings
FDCFF
FNCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDCFF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (69). This means that FDCFF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (100). This means that FDCFF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDCFF (100). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDCFF (94). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCFF (100). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDCFFFNCJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FDCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFNCX83.380.86
+1.04%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529C
JDWAX113.521.03
+0.92%
Janus Henderson Global Research A
VYCCX24.540.21
+0.86%
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 I
CCPAX14.030.10
+0.72%
FS Chiron Capital Allocation A
TFESX10.790.04
+0.37%
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Service

FDCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCFF has been loosely correlated with UEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDCFF jumps, then UEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCFF
1D Price
Change %
FDCFF100%
+5.26%
UEC - FDCFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.36%
ISENF - FDCFF
31%
Poorly correlated
+9.60%
DNN - FDCFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
BSENF - FDCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
UROY - FDCFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
More

FNCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCJF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCJF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCJF
1D Price
Change %
FNCJF100%
-8.04%
OMHLF - FNCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FQVLF - FNCJF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
FPOCF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
FPRGF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
+11.29%
FDCFF - FNCJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
More